The UN wants to control WHAT?!..
I'm certain that most of you know about the massive effort that is underway to wrest control of the Internet from America. I've been asked quite a bit about this today, so I thought I'd go ahead and explain this little farce.
The Internet as you know it is not "controlled" by any single entity. The content published from American sources is certainly subject to U.S. law, but the networks that make up the Internet are all private. Yes, I said private. These private entities include businesses, universities, and governments. Each of these entities agree to certain rules and restrictions in order to be allowed the right to participate in the Internet infrastructure. The most important of these rules are the naming and numbering conventions. Have you ever heard the term, "IP address"? If you have a computer or NAT boundary device connected to the Internet, then you certainly have. The IP address was issued to you by your service provider. Your service provider was given blocks of IP addresses by a registar, or "NIC" (Network Information Center) and that NIC was given addresses by an organization called, "ICANN" (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers). ICANN has already handed out all of the public addresses to the NICs, but it's still got some blocks it controls. The real work is in the naming. ICANN was formed during the Clinton administration for the purpose of creating a private body that could act as a go-between for governmental and non-governmental Internet issues, and provide rules and regulations. ICANN controls what is called the Domain Naming System (DNS) "root server" for all of the Generic Top-Level Domains (GLTDs). i.e. .com, .org. This is the primary mechanism by which you can open your web browser and type http://badj.blogspot.com. This is called a "Fully-qualified domain name" or FQDN. The US Commerce Department has a final say-so as a last resort, should any ICANN issue require that level of intervention. I know some of this is getting technical, but I needed to impart that information.
Ok.. now you have an idea of the framework. American society in it's marvelous capacity for innovation has boosted the technologies and standards that have caused the Internet to progress from fad to necessity. The rest of the world wants to change this. Yes, that's right. It's not broke, so by all means, let's have some foreign governments completely and utterly screw up the Internet with about a million new rules and levels of bureaucratic nonsense. What in the world would suddenly cause the planet to rise up and make this demand? Let's have a look at that, shall we?
Obviously, the first element would be simply, control. Currently, every nation is answerable to the United States in the affairs of the Internet. Americans want a clean and functional Internet. Americans fight spam, hackers, and viruses, all with zeal and technical prowess. Should the United Nations get this control, you'll see a multiplication of such Internet-based sewage unlike anything anyone can even fathom. There's also the matter of the Internet being a completely open network. The exchange of ideas has already created a vast boon for countless masses. Countries like China, for example, want to put a stop to that as soon as possible. Wresting the Internet from control of America is how they intend to do exactly that.
Next, there's money involved. Already, a trillion dollars has changed hands over the Internet. By far, the United States has benefitted the most from said commerce. The rest of the world thinks it's somehow being 'cheated' out of it's self-perceived allowance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Moving money on the Internet is the same as buying bread at the grocery store with one simple exception: Trust.
The basic problem for the rest of the world is that it is, in fact, the rest of the world. Ebay has taught us all a very important lesson: If you're not buying from someone in America, your chances of getting screwed on the transaction go up exponentially. Personally, I'm not about to buy a single thing from some guy in Chad. I'm not giving anyone in Tunis my credit card number. Ever. I think most, if not all of my fellow Americans share this sentiment. The rest of the world cannot understand this. The Libyans, for example, honestly believe that the US Government is holding back untold riches that can be had via the Internet. I'm serious. This is preposterous, but nevertheless, that's the way they feel. If this was my own blog, I'd call them delusional simpletons. Wait, this is my blog. Alright, they're idiots.
Control and money are the motivating factors for this sudden upswell of ouraged voices all around the globe. I've highlighted a couple of disdvantages to allowing anyone but ICANN regulate the naming and numbering system, but there are a few more that I'd like to share with you.
Let's put our special imagining hats on. Yes, you have a special imagining hat. Put it on.
Tomorrow, an international governing body will take control of the root servers. In an unsurprising announcement, a new list of rules governing naming and numbering is released immediately.
That day, all of the registrars throughout the globe find that getting new TLDs will be an extraordinary challenge. In addition, there will be new rules for how these addresses will be moving (routing) traffic across the Internet. Now you're asking if this new governing body can control that. The answer is, "Yes, absolutely." See, the naming is exceedingly valuable. The address space is nothing compared to the naming. The new UN Internet now has rules for allocating name space that will include rules for routing traffic as a fundamental component of name space assignment. The plot thickens.
Overnight, the current Class A network owners with immense interest in Internet commerce receive letters notifying them that their name space is not operating within the new guidelines and that their name space will be removed or redirected at the root servers unless they agree to pay an "administration fee" along with some brand new "taxes" on top of the new fifty-fold name space price increase. Chaos ensues. Entire companies who rely on the Internet for livelihood suddenly start disappearing from the Internet. Ebay vanishes.
Foreign countries with little or no presence on the Internet are inexplicably and suddenly granted rights to allocated name space as it is stripped away from Americans, all under the guise of "rules violations".
Voice-over-IP services begin wholesale shutdowns. Religious, Medical and Educational information systems that have safely and reliably relied on the Internet for years suddenly face mountains of legal restrictions and content controls.
Private VPN connections begin failing. Ordinary Internet users find themselves in the dark. Tier-1 providers race frantically to find peer connections and top-level name services.
.. and here's the kicker.. the U.S. Government's .gov TLD will suddenly come under fire. The new UN Internet governing body will summarily decide that the use of that TLD costs 80 billion dollars a year to register.
In a few days, the UN begins to start relaxing a few ancillary restrictions, but the Internet is now changed forever. Providers are locking themselves into war rooms. Conference calls with carriers, corporations, and NAP (Network Access Point) providers are happening all over the nation.
Then suddenly, it will happen... The United States of America will collectively make it's own Internet. Yep, that's right. All of the networks in America are already in place. The tough work will come with the addressing, naming, and oh boy.. the BGP Peering. (It's how networks tell one another where IP addresses are located.) Out of nowhere, the Commerce Department will announce that ICANN has been named the regulatory body for the new American Internet, and we're back in business. Sure, there will be a huge mess to sort out, but the infrastructure is ready to handle it from day one. Everything else will be reconfiguration and administration.
Nations, organizations, and companies will beg and plead for connections to the new American Internet. At every turn, they will be denied. Internet commerce will slowly get back up to speed. Foreign countries are now totally locked out of the money loop. The UN implodes and emphatically demands that the new American Internet be placed under international control.
Not a pretty picture, is it?
